<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Don&#039;t ask, don&#039;t tell&quot; &#8211; Obama&#039;s choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justoneopinion.com/dont-ask-dont-tell/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justoneopinion.com/dont-ask-dont-tell#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Commentary on news, politics, religion, and the economy...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 19:55:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob rogers</title>
		<link>http://justoneopinion.com/dont-ask-dont-tell/comment-page-1#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>bob rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justoneopinion.com/?p=1908#comment-344</guid>
		<description>I agree with both of you. He did make a promise and I believe, if he&#039;s given eight years, that he will complete the promise. He also promised to be pragmatic. This might be one of those times. We need to give him a little more time to do it in a way that is not divisive. Unlike his predecessor, he doesn&#039;t like to force things on us.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;344&#039;,&#039;bob rogers&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;344&#039;,&#039;bob rogers&#039;,&#039;I agree with both of you. He did make a promise and I believe, if he\&#039;s given eight years, that he will complete the promise. He also promised to be pragmatic. This might be one of those times. We need to give him a little more time to do it in a way that is not divisive. Unlike his predecessor, he doesn\&#039;t like to force things on us.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with both of you. He did make a promise and I believe, if he&#8217;s given eight years, that he will complete the promise. He also promised to be pragmatic. This might be one of those times. We need to give him a little more time to do it in a way that is not divisive. Unlike his predecessor, he doesn&#8217;t like to force things on us.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('344','bob rogers'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('344','bob rogers','I agree with both of you. He did make a promise and I believe, if he\'s given eight years, that he will complete the promise. He also promised to be pragmatic. This might be one of those times. We need to give him a little more time to do it in a way that is not divisive. Unlike his predecessor, he doesn\'t like to force things on us.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard E. Kelly</title>
		<link>http://justoneopinion.com/dont-ask-dont-tell/comment-page-1#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard E. Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justoneopinion.com/?p=1908#comment-342</guid>
		<description>John, what you report is all well and good. However, a considerable amount of political capital would be expended if the President simply issued an executive order now to discontinue DADT. Particularly when so many people in this country see this issue as integral to their religious experience. Simply, this is a very emotional, and yes irrational topic for many so-called true believers who choose to cherry pick what they think the Bible mandates for Christians. I think Obama is an excellent politician and clearly understands how his actions, however well meaning that they may be, could distract progress on other, more pressing initiatives. Although I suspect he will strike when he feels the time is right.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;342&#039;,&#039;Richard E. Kelly&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;342&#039;,&#039;Richard E. Kelly&#039;,&#039;John, what you report is all well and good. However, a considerable amount of political capital would be expended if the President simply issued an executive order now to discontinue DADT. Particularly when so many people in this country see this issue as integral to their religious experience. Simply, this is a very emotional, and yes irrational topic for many so-called true believers who choose to cherry pick what they think the Bible mandates for Christians. I think Obama is an excellent politician and clearly understands how his actions, however well meaning that they may be, could distract progress on other, more pressing initiatives. Although I suspect he will strike when he feels the time is right.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, what you report is all well and good. However, a considerable amount of political capital would be expended if the President simply issued an executive order now to discontinue DADT. Particularly when so many people in this country see this issue as integral to their religious experience. Simply, this is a very emotional, and yes irrational topic for many so-called true believers who choose to cherry pick what they think the Bible mandates for Christians. I think Obama is an excellent politician and clearly understands how his actions, however well meaning that they may be, could distract progress on other, more pressing initiatives. Although I suspect he will strike when he feels the time is right.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('342','Richard E. Kelly'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('342','Richard E. Kelly','John, what you report is all well and good. However, a considerable amount of political capital would be expended if the President simply issued an executive order now to discontinue DADT. Particularly when so many people in this country see this issue as integral to their religious experience. Simply, this is a very emotional, and yes irrational topic for many so-called true believers who choose to cherry pick what they think the Bible mandates for Christians. I think Obama is an excellent politician and clearly understands how his actions, however well meaning that they may be, could distract progress on other, more pressing initiatives. Although I suspect he will strike when he feels the time is right.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hoyle</title>
		<link>http://justoneopinion.com/dont-ask-dont-tell/comment-page-1#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hoyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justoneopinion.com/?p=1908#comment-343</guid>
		<description>Dick,
In terms of what should be on President Obama&#039;s priorities list I think we can all agree that getting the economy in order and ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are at the top.

Both of those issues along with energy usage and resource development are clearly important and very complex and will take some time to fully implement.

On the other hand, the issue of &quot;Don&#039;t ask, don&#039;t tell&quot; can be resolved very quickly by the President by simply issuing an Executive Order under his powers as Commander-in-chief, temporarily ending the enforcement of this command order until he can get back to it later when he has more time or whenever Congress decides to take action.

Our military services are losing many loyal, highly trained and qualified men and women, American citizens who actually want to be in service and are willing to put their lives at risk for our benefit - only because of their unwillingness to try to appear to be what they are not.

Would we ask a soldier who was Jewish to hide his religion and claim to be Christian - because a few of the other soldiers might be offended or not like Jews?  Are we going to kick out all of the African-Americans who are in service because we still have some soldiers from the south who dislike being around black people?  Are we going to force all the women in service to resign or send them home because - well, pick a reason: How do they change clothes in mixed sleeping quarters? What will they do when they have their periods? How will they go to the bathroom out in the field between battles? Hey, women are emotional and might cry during a battle, right? They&#039;re the weaker sex and might get hurt.

The real excuse for forcing homosexuals out of service was clearly stated by the general in the attached video: he thinks they&#039;re sissies, they&#039;ll go weak during a battle, they&#039;re not man enough (except for the lesbians, of course - they&#039;re entirely &quot;too manly&quot;), they&#039;ll let their fellow soldiers down under fire, the other guys will have to protect them, and any number of other ridiculous excuses that could just as easily apply to women in combat. Women are not being tossed out of the service for being women, i.e., the &quot;weaker sex.&quot;

Let&#039;s face it: There is no good reason at all to continue DADT in the American military and every good reason to end it now and forever. Obama - do your duty!&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;343&#039;,&#039;John Hoyle&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;343&#039;,&#039;John Hoyle&#039;,&#039;Dick,\nIn terms of what should be on President Obama\&#039;s priorities list I think we can all agree that getting the economy in order and ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are at the top.\n\nBoth of those issues along with energy usage and resource development are clearly important and very complex and will take some time to fully implement.\n\nOn the other hand, the issue of \&quot;Don\&#039;t ask, don\&#039;t tell\&quot; can be resolved very quickly by the President by simply issuing an Executive Order under his powers as Commander-in-chief, temporarily ending the enforcement of this command order until he can get back to it later when he has more time or whenever Congress decides to take action.\n\nOur military services are losing many loyal, highly trained and qualified men and women, American citizens who actually want to be in service and are willing to put their lives at risk for our benefit - only because of their unwillingness to try to appear to be what they are not.\n\nWould we ask a soldier who was Jewish to hide his religion and claim to be Christian - because a few of the other soldiers might be offended or not like Jews?  Are we going to kick out all of the African-Americans who are in service because we still have some soldiers from the south who dislike being around black people?  Are we going to force all the women in service to resign or send them home because - well, pick a reason: How do they change clothes in mixed sleeping quarters? What will they do when they have their periods? How will they go to the bathroom out in the field between battles? Hey, women are emotional and might cry during a battle, right? They\&#039;re the weaker sex and might get hurt.\n\nThe real excuse for forcing homosexuals out of service was clearly stated by the general in the attached video: he thinks they\&#039;re sissies, they\&#039;ll go weak during a battle, they\&#039;re not man enough (except for the lesbians, of course - they\&#039;re entirely \&quot;too manly\&quot;), they\&#039;ll let their fellow soldiers down under fire, the other guys will have to protect them, and any number of other ridiculous excuses that could just as easily apply to women in combat. Women are not being tossed out of the service for being women, i.e., the \&quot;weaker sex.\&quot;\n\nLet\&#039;s face it: There is no good reason at all to continue DADT in the American military and every good reason to end it now and forever. Obama - do your duty!&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick,<br />
In terms of what should be on President Obama&#8217;s priorities list I think we can all agree that getting the economy in order and ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are at the top.</p>
<p>Both of those issues along with energy usage and resource development are clearly important and very complex and will take some time to fully implement.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the issue of &#8220;Don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; can be resolved very quickly by the President by simply issuing an Executive Order under his powers as Commander-in-chief, temporarily ending the enforcement of this command order until he can get back to it later when he has more time or whenever Congress decides to take action.</p>
<p>Our military services are losing many loyal, highly trained and qualified men and women, American citizens who actually want to be in service and are willing to put their lives at risk for our benefit &#8211; only because of their unwillingness to try to appear to be what they are not.</p>
<p>Would we ask a soldier who was Jewish to hide his religion and claim to be Christian &#8211; because a few of the other soldiers might be offended or not like Jews?  Are we going to kick out all of the African-Americans who are in service because we still have some soldiers from the south who dislike being around black people?  Are we going to force all the women in service to resign or send them home because &#8211; well, pick a reason: How do they change clothes in mixed sleeping quarters? What will they do when they have their periods? How will they go to the bathroom out in the field between battles? Hey, women are emotional and might cry during a battle, right? They&#8217;re the weaker sex and might get hurt.</p>
<p>The real excuse for forcing homosexuals out of service was clearly stated by the general in the attached video: he thinks they&#8217;re sissies, they&#8217;ll go weak during a battle, they&#8217;re not man enough (except for the lesbians, of course &#8211; they&#8217;re entirely &#8220;too manly&#8221;), they&#8217;ll let their fellow soldiers down under fire, the other guys will have to protect them, and any number of other ridiculous excuses that could just as easily apply to women in combat. Women are not being tossed out of the service for being women, i.e., the &#8220;weaker sex.&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it: There is no good reason at all to continue DADT in the American military and every good reason to end it now and forever. Obama &#8211; do your duty!
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('343','John Hoyle'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('343','John Hoyle','Dick,\nIn terms of what should be on President Obama\'s priorities list I think we can all agree that getting the economy in order and ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are at the top.\n\nBoth of those issues along with energy usage and resource development are clearly important and very complex and will take some time to fully implement.\n\nOn the other hand, the issue of \&quot;Don\'t ask, don\'t tell\&quot; can be resolved very quickly by the President by simply issuing an Executive Order under his powers as Commander-in-chief, temporarily ending the enforcement of this command order until he can get back to it later when he has more time or whenever Congress decides to take action.\n\nOur military services are losing many loyal, highly trained and qualified men and women, American citizens who actually want to be in service and are willing to put their lives at risk for our benefit - only because of their unwillingness to try to appear to be what they are not.\n\nWould we ask a soldier who was Jewish to hide his religion and claim to be Christian - because a few of the other soldiers might be offended or not like Jews?  Are we going to kick out all of the African-Americans who are in service because we still have some soldiers from the south who dislike being around black people?  Are we going to force all the women in service to resign or send them home because - well, pick a reason: How do they change clothes in mixed sleeping quarters? What will they do when they have their periods? How will they go to the bathroom out in the field between battles? Hey, women are emotional and might cry during a battle, right? They\'re the weaker sex and might get hurt.\n\nThe real excuse for forcing homosexuals out of service was clearly stated by the general in the attached video: he thinks they\'re sissies, they\'ll go weak during a battle, they\'re not man enough (except for the lesbians, of course - they\'re entirely \&quot;too manly\&quot;), they\'ll let their fellow soldiers down under fire, the other guys will have to protect them, and any number of other ridiculous excuses that could just as easily apply to women in combat. Women are not being tossed out of the service for being women, i.e., the \&quot;weaker sex.\&quot;\n\nLet\'s face it: There is no good reason at all to continue DADT in the American military and every good reason to end it now and forever. Obama - do your duty!'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard E. Kelly</title>
		<link>http://justoneopinion.com/dont-ask-dont-tell/comment-page-1#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard E. Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justoneopinion.com/?p=1908#comment-341</guid>
		<description>John, as always, a very informative and timely post. While I agree with you in principle, I wonder how many new programs President Obama can have going on at one time and still be effective. In my business life, I tried to prioritize my time with projects that I tagged with &quot;must do&quot;, &quot;should do&quot;, and &quot;would like to do.&quot;&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;341&#039;,&#039;Richard E. Kelly&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;341&#039;,&#039;Richard E. Kelly&#039;,&#039;John, as always, a very informative and timely post. While I agree with you in principle, I wonder how many new programs President Obama can have going on at one time and still be effective. In my business life, I tried to prioritize my time with projects that I tagged with \&quot;must do\&quot;, \&quot;should do\&quot;, and \&quot;would like to do.\&quot;&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, as always, a very informative and timely post. While I agree with you in principle, I wonder how many new programs President Obama can have going on at one time and still be effective. In my business life, I tried to prioritize my time with projects that I tagged with &#8220;must do&#8221;, &#8220;should do&#8221;, and &#8220;would like to do.&#8221;
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('341','Richard E. Kelly'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('341','Richard E. Kelly','John, as always, a very informative and timely post. While I agree with you in principle, I wonder how many new programs President Obama can have going on at one time and still be effective. In my business life, I tried to prioritize my time with projects that I tagged with \&quot;must do\&quot;, \&quot;should do\&quot;, and \&quot;would like to do.\&quot;'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about Barack Obama as of June 8, 2009 &#187; The Daily Parr</title>
		<link>http://justoneopinion.com/dont-ask-dont-tell/comment-page-1#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about Barack Obama as of June 8, 2009 &#187; The Daily Parr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justoneopinion.com/?p=1908#comment-340</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he was just using them to advance his career.’” I’m not gonna argue whether President Obama   “Don’t ask, don’t tell” &#8211; Obama’s choice &#8211; justoneopinion.com 06/08/2009 During last year’s campaign, President Barack Obama promised to [...]
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('340','Posts about Barack Obama as of June 8, 2009 &amp;raquo; The Daily Parr'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('340','Posts about Barack Obama as of June 8, 2009 &amp;raquo; The Daily Parr','&amp;#91;...&amp;#93; he was just using them to advance his career.&acirc;&acirc; I&acirc;m not gonna argue whether President Obama   &acirc;Don&acirc;t ask, don&acirc;t tell&acirc; - Obama&acirc;s choice - justoneopinion.com 06\/08\/2009 During last year&acirc;s campaign, President Barack Obama promised to &amp;#91;...&amp;#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

