Comments on: Is Intelligent Design science? http://justoneopinion.com/is-intelligent-design-science#utm_source=feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed Commentary on news, politics, religion, and the economy... Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:55:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Bob Rogers http://justoneopinion.com/is-intelligent-design-science/comment-page-1#comment-510 Bob Rogers Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:02:40 +0000 http://justoneopinion.com/?p=2147#comment-510 Another nice look at reality Richard. I always wonder why people chose to base what they believe on a set of faith based ideas dictated by authority figures from a distant past. The core ideas are often good; the teachings of Jesus are a wonderful set of values, for any time. However the religion named for him was co opted by radical power based leadership, leaving behind the core teachings.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('510','Bob Rogers'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('510','Bob Rogers','Another nice look at reality Richard. I always wonder why people chose to base what they believe on a set of faith based ideas dictated by authority figures from a distant past. The core ideas are often good; the teachings of Jesus are a wonderful set of values, for any time. However the religion named for him was co opted by radical power based leadership, leaving behind the core teachings.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Another nice look at reality Richard. I always wonder why people chose to base what they believe on a set of faith based ideas dictated by authority figures from a distant past. The core ideas are often good; the teachings of Jesus are a wonderful set of values, for any time. However the religion named for him was co opted by radical power based leadership, leaving behind the core teachings.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Steve XXXXXX http://justoneopinion.com/is-intelligent-design-science/comment-page-1#comment-509 Steve XXXXXX Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:22:47 +0000 http://justoneopinion.com/?p=2147#comment-509 I enjoyed your article on Intelligent Design. So that’s what they’re calling it today. (Shakespeare said it best with, “What’s in a name.”)
As far as mankind being the result of a super natural, intelligent design force, that designer should go back and do some reverse engineering to get it straight.
I loved the orangutan in front of the blackboard giving a lesson on the evolution of man, which reminded me of the story about a man who went to the zoo and could read the thoughts of animals. When he was in front of the monkey cage, the monkey stared straight into his eyes and thought:

“So you think you’ve evolved from me. Well let me tell you sir. It’s true that we both stand upright, and it’s true that we both can be silly, and that we both need sleep and to eat. But if you’re thinking that your kind is more intelligent than mine, think again. When have you heard of my kind strapping explosives around our backs to kill our brothers? When have you heard of my kind raping and killing in the name of their God? We take what we need and we try to live and let live. Yes, it’s true that man evolved, the intelligent cuss, but he didn’t evolve from us.”

Reply – Quote
]]> By: Mark Evans http://justoneopinion.com/is-intelligent-design-science/comment-page-1#comment-506 Mark Evans Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:54:38 +0000 http://justoneopinion.com/?p=2147#comment-506 Intelligent Design relates to science in much the same fashion Secular Humanism relates to religion. They are buzz words created to justify points of view by prejudicing science. Albert Einstein became a tragic figure when he went down the road of trying to make his round science fit his square religion. It would have been much more productive creating a religion that enveloped his science.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('506','Mark Evans'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('506','Mark Evans','Intelligent Design relates to science in much the same fashion Secular Humanism relates to religion. They are buzz words created to justify points of view by prejudicing science. Albert Einstein became a tragic figure when he went down the road of trying to make his round science fit his square religion. It would have been much more productive creating a religion that enveloped his science.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Intelligent Design relates to science in much the same fashion Secular Humanism relates to religion. They are buzz words created to justify points of view by prejudicing science. Albert Einstein became a tragic figure when he went down the road of trying to make his round science fit his square religion. It would have been much more productive creating a religion that enveloped his science.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Melissa G http://justoneopinion.com/is-intelligent-design-science/comment-page-1#comment-502 Melissa G Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:25:03 +0000 http://justoneopinion.com/?p=2147#comment-502 Of course I was taught that ID was the standard, and the theory of evolution was just that...a silly theory that was labled a theory because it couldn't be proven. Oh how tricky they can be when brainwashing their children. The reality is that their explanation doesn't even reach the level of theory, as explained so well here Dick.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('502','Melissa G'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('502','Melissa G','Of course I was taught that ID was the standard, and the theory of evolution was just that...a silly theory that was labled a theory because it couldn\'t be proven. Oh how tricky they can be when brainwashing their children. The reality is that their explanation doesn\'t even reach the level of theory, as explained so well here Dick.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Of course I was taught that ID was the standard, and the theory of evolution was just that…a silly theory that was labled a theory because it couldn’t be proven. Oh how tricky they can be when brainwashing their children. The reality is that their explanation doesn’t even reach the level of theory, as explained so well here Dick.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: bobxxxx http://justoneopinion.com/is-intelligent-design-science/comment-page-1#comment-500 bobxxxx Sun, 06 Sep 2009 01:05:53 +0000 http://justoneopinion.com/?p=2147#comment-500 The basic tenant of Intelligent Design is "The Magic Man Did It." Of course it's bullshit, and of course it's just magical creation poorly disguised to look scientific.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('500','bobxxxx'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('500','bobxxxx','The basic tenant of Intelligent Design is \"The Magic Man Did It.\" Of course it\'s bullshit, and of course it\'s just magical creation poorly disguised to look scientific.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> The basic tenant of Intelligent Design is “The Magic Man Did It.” Of course it’s bullshit, and of course it’s just magical creation poorly disguised to look scientific.
Reply – Quote
]]>